After they remade Wes Craven's The Last House On The Left in 2009, they then had a focus on Meir Zarchi's infamous I Spit On Your Grave (which by the way was called Day Of The Woman when it first ran in theatres in 1978) just one year. By now, they even remake Rape'N'Revenge movies. The original was much more believable in that Ms. The Movie The remake-trend obviously won't come to an end soon. But once again, if she doesn’t come back as she did there would be no movie. And very ingeniously as well but once again i have to ask “How was she able to do what she did considering the condition she was in the last time we saw her on the screen”? It just isn’t possible. Jennifer dispatches each one of them in a way they degraded her. His wife not knowing that he is a degenerate makes the scenes the family have together that much more tragic. I believe it was to contrast the fact that the sheriff is married with a young daughter & another child on the way to a lovely woman who obviously loves him dearly. that the film is devoid of music (all we get is some diegetic sounds from. Except for the sheriff’s rape scene which was on the screen a little too long to my liking. The movie in question, is Meir Zarchis 1978 classic I Spit On Your Grave. The rape scenes, while graphic, cut away on occasion.
There was no way the ratings board would let these scenes go without significant cuts. We are talking major violence here folks. Monroe rushed out a sequel last year that was a huge disappointment. Her revenge scenes go way beyond the pale & way beyond what the comeupances for the rapists in the original were. Monroe-directed I Spit on Your Grave was a shockingly good remake of the 1978 classic. What I want to end this review on is why I feel the film is being released unrated. I have told you way too much of the story already. But as most screenwriters & directors will tell you: If what was supposed to happen actually happened, we wouldn’t have a movie would we? She should’ve died of exposure soon afterwards. Hell…she couldn’t even hold her breath that long after jumping into what I assume was a cold river completely naked. But come on now…she could not have done what she did after jumping off of that bridge. So audiences forget about the scenes that didn’t make sense earlier. These scenes are usually forgtten about because there’s usually a big payoff directly afterwards.
I know that movies like this one live & die on scenes that don’t add up. Where did that sucker come from? Plot holes people…plot holes. She even ends up with a Black Corvette in the most graphic revenge scene. But the script doesn’t tell us any more than that. Where has she been? Where did she get clothing from? She does make a reference to what she had to eat to survive in the woods while planning her revenge (rats apparently). But after some time goes by she starts making her prescence known to her attackers. It didn’t make sense then & it still doesn’t but her attackers in the original just leave her be after the atrocities put upon her. In the original the victim was left alone to go back to her cabin in the woods.
0 kommentar(er)
